Writing outcome statments like 'increased awareness' works for a logframe. It does not for Outcome Harvesting (OH). Learn why OH demands a different approach and how to write clear, verifiable outcome statements that hold up under scrutiny.

Outcome Harvesting (OH) is a powerful approach for monitoring and evaluation, especially in complex, dynamic environments where change isn’t always linear. This article offers practical lessons learned from real organisations that have used OH to track advocacy, capacity-building, and social change efforts. Whether you’re new to OH or trying to refine your practice, this guide helps you avoid common mistakes like treating OH as a reporting checkbox or skipping substantiation.

Outcome Harvesting flips traditional evaluation on its head. Instead of measuring what you planned to achieve, it helps you uncover what actually happened, intended or not. Whether you're mapping policy shifts, grassroots influence, or unexpected wins, this webinar will show you how to surface real outcomes and make sense of them.

This article gives you tips to integrate Outcome Harvesting into your existing Monitoring and Evaluation system so it is not a burden or...

What is Outcome Harvesting? Picture this, instead of predicting the outcomes of a project or program from the start, you collect them as...

In the last blog post it was discussed that ideally, baseline data should be collected prior to the implementation of a project or...

Can you monitor or even evaluate a project for which baseline data was never collected? Or a project for which a proper logical framework...