Writing outcome statments like 'increased awareness' works for a logframe. It does not for Outcome Harvesting (OH). Learn why OH demands a different approach and how to write clear, verifiable outcome statements that hold up under scrutiny.

Outcome Harvesting (OH) is a powerful approach for monitoring and evaluation, especially in complex, dynamic environments where change isn’t always linear. This article offers practical lessons learned from real organisations that have used OH to track advocacy, capacity-building, and social change efforts. Whether you’re new to OH or trying to refine your practice, this guide helps you avoid common mistakes like treating OH as a reporting checkbox or skipping substantiation.

Overview of the different evaluation types, when to use them and the steps to conduct an evaluation

I have had a few assignments where I had to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, results and impacts of policies. Here is a nice...

'Research' and 'evaluation' does have similarities such as the approach to sampling, data collection methods they employ and sometimes...

In this webinar recording I spoke with Margaret R. Roller, co-author of "Applied Qualitative Research Design A Total Quality Framework...

I found this great visual on formative and summative evaluations courtesy of My Environmental Education Resource Assistant (MEERA). You...